I am really sorry about this, but … as we state in our Guidelines, once your piece has been accepted it goes through an editorial and production process that takes a lot of time. Our policy is therefore not to implement changes in a piece that’s been accepted unless there’s a factual error or grammatical mistake (if that’s the situation, then please flag the error). The schedule of the production editor is already heavy enough as is without my putting an additional burden on him of reposting stories he’s already posted. I hope you understand. HNN has a small staff. We are overwhelmed as is. This is our standard reply. The fact that we need a standard reply suggests how often this happens. I hope that makes our policy more understandable.
Article length may vary depending on subject matter. Most articles run about 1,000 words. Only in rare cases should footnotes be included -- instead, please use embedded links.
- When did Vesuvius erupt?
- With a House Takeover, Democrats Could Get Trump’s Tax Returns
- Trump called Ulysses S. Grant an alcoholic. Here’s what historians say about that.
- Hailed as a Hero, Executed as a Spy, and Exonerated Decades Later
- Parasites from medieval latrines unlock secrets of human history
- Daniel Pipes has an answer to a question a Hungarian historian asked
- Anti-Semitism and the Birth of Jewish Studies
- Historian Christopher Browning on the Trump regime: We’re “close to the point of no return”
- Carol Anderson says voter suppression led to Trump's election
- Sean Wilentz says the Supreme Court’s legitimacy is now at stake